Thursday, 30 April 2009

Déjà Vu Salter




The Government loose a historic battle against the Gurkhas, the last such loss of an opposition motion was 1978! But what happened to the leader of the Labour rebels? Well not unlike last time, Salter was full of quotes for the media about how important this was. But when it came time to vote he abstained!

It leaves many in Reading with a feeling of deja vu, as we've seen this before. In the Iraq war vote he was often in the media as a rebel. But where was he during the vote? Absent.

Locally he has become something of a legend for his hypocrisy, attacking constituents,
being against hunting but supporting shooting,
both supporting and against name changes, getting climate change wrong and calling Polish people thieves.


If people from other countries are eligible to live here after four years, why should Gurkhas need 10 years service? The Greens believe in Justice for all, and support Gurkhas. They laid their lives on the line for this country, most people want them to have citizenship.

Wednesday, 29 April 2009

Fix My Street


What a great website, you write a report about whats going on, it goes antomaricsally to your local authority. Also it can be seen by others, you can check if somone has reported a problem already.

There is a facility to look at more problems nearby, http://www.fixmystreet.com/?y=1072;x=2911

He are my first reports:
http://www.fixmystreet.com/report/55922
http://www.fixmystreet.com/report/55904

Tuesday, 28 April 2009

No Justice Yet For Gurkhas


I had an email today regarding Gurkha Justice from Joanna Lumley.





As you may know, on Friday, the Government badly let down the Gurkhas. The new rules they have announced will exclude the huge majority of ex-Gurkhas who retired before 1997 from claiming citizenship in this country. They've given five bullet points that virtually cannot be met by the ordinary Gurkha soldier.

It is so obvious that the treatment of the Gurkhas has been a great injustice. To treat them like this is despicable.

The strong reaction by the public and press should show the Government that they simply cannot get away with this outrage.

I'm ashamed of our adminstration. We will be challenging this decision in the courts and in Parliament. We will not stop now.

This is not a party political campaign: it's simply one for justice. I am so grateful though for immediate support from MPs from all Parties, including amongst others Conservative leader David Cameron and Lib Dem Leader Nick Clegg.

Nick Clegg has agreed to put a vote to Parliament this Wednesday calling for a fair deal for Gurkhas. This vote on its own won't change the Government's ruling, but would be an overwhelming signal to the Government that they need to think again.

We need all MPs that support the Gurkha justice cause to turn up and vote for a proper deal for Gurkhas on Wednesday. Can I ask that you take a couple of minutes right now to ask your MP to do so?

You can send a message to your MP directly at www.theyworkforyou.com - please ask them to support the Gurkha Justice motion on Wednesday.

On Wednesday, there will also be a Gurkha Justice rally and protest against the Government's decision, starting at noon in Old Palace Yard, Westminster. Many MPs have already committed to support the vote and join me and others at the rally. I know it's awfully short notice, but if you can, please do come along as well to add your support.

If you can pass on this message to others as well that would be fabulous - and if they sign up to www.gurkhajustice.org.uk we can keep in touch with them directly in future.

Lastly, again, thank you so much for your support. It means so much to us. I spoke today to Lt Madan Kumar Gurung, who has been at the forefront of the campaign since it began. He said to me that he has no fear for the Gurkhas any more, as he knows the loving hearts of the British people will not let them down. With your support we won't.

With warmest good wishes,

Joanna
www.gurkhajustice.org.uk

Reading Debate; Hydrogen Vs Electric Car




Top industry experts will converge in Reading on Wednesday to debate the future of alternative cars and ask if the Government’s drive for consumers to buy electric is 'pushing hydrogen vehicles off the road'. The event takes place on Wednesday (29 April), from 6pm – 9pm at Foster Wheeler House, Shinfield Park, Reading.

Gasoline cars will one day be phased out; perhaps the replacement will be hydrogen fuel cell powered vehicles or electric vehicles. Both have pros, as well as many cons, quite a few of which are simply due to the early stages they are in.

Let’s look at hydrogen fuel cells first. When burned in an engine, the only emissions giving off is water, so a hydrogen powered vehicle is a zero emission vehicle. Hydrogen is also a better fuel than gasoline, it actually has the highest energy content per unit of weight of any known fuel. Hydrogen is also a very abundant element, though currently made by using fossil fuels, such as natural gas, coal, and oil. Also, hydrogen can be extracted from water, and we all know there’s a lot of water on this planet. Also, the technology to store hydrogen efficiently is still not ready yet.

One of the biggest disadvantages to a hydrogen fuel cell powered vehicle is the difficulty in refilling the hydrogen. Were these cars to become extremely popular, it would be possible to replace modern gas stations with hydrogen stations, but this would cost billions to do. As it is right now, hydrogen refills would be almost impossible to find outside of a few major cities.

In recent years, electric cars have been coming back on the scene in force. There are many hybrid models that have been available for a few years, and this year the first fully electric cars were released to consumers. Modern fully electric vehicles have a lot going for them. They are considered Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEV), since when they are running they give off no emissions. However, they are powered from the modern power grid, most of which is fossil fuel and gives off emissions. Modern electric vehicles have a range of about 250 miles. They can also store power during the day when it can be less in demand.

The main disadvantage electric vehicles have is that we are used to filling up, a recharge is not as simple as stopping at a gas station. A full recharge can take anywhere from five to eight hours – that’s just fine if you are commuting, but not practical for a long road trip. GM has proposed an answer to the distance difficulty by introducing the Volt – an electric vehicle equipped with an auxiliary motor designed to recharge the battery and extend the potential driving distance to as far as 600 miles. The auxiliary motor could be powered by gasoline, diesel, ethanol, or hydrogen.

Ethanol from corn or sugar cane(or soy biodiesel) requires land that puts pressure on the food supply, and it also requires petroleum to be grown and harvested. Ethanol from biomass decreases the need for fossil fuels and can be made from waste agriculture, but it is still requires vast land to fuel even a small percentage of vehicles, the technology is still in the laboratory phase, and it requires building out a distribution infrastructure.

Hydrogen fuel cell technology currently requires three to four times more energy to produce than it later generates, while plug-in critics maintain that battery technology is not advanced enough for long distance driving, and that the electricity grid would be overstretched if an entire nation attempted to recharge its cars.

The technology for mainstream electric cars is also not quite ready for all the major manufacturers to stop making gasoline powered cars, but it’s much closer than hydrogen currently.


http://www.wired.com/autopia/2007/03/hydrogen_vs_bat
http://ezinearticles.com/?Hydrogen-Fuel-Cell-Cars-vs-Electric-Cars---Which-Is-Really-The-Car-Of-The-Future?&id=555594
http://www.mindsinmotion.net/index.php/mim/themes/hydrogen_for_mobility/opinion/hydrogen_vs_electric_the_battle_continues

Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 0207 304 6888 or email media@imeche.org.

Monday, 27 April 2009

Petition To Get The PM To Resign

This was launched recently on the Number Ten site. It's got over 16,000 signatures at the moment. Sign up and then spread the word.

It was mentioned on the Today programme headlines, and not a few bloggers including;
http://www.order-order.com/2009/04/just-go-petition/
http://iaindale.blogspot.com/
http://waswasere.blogspot.com/2009/04/resign.html
http://jonesindep.blogspot.com/2009/04/petition-we-call-on-prime-minister-to.html
and many more.

If you haven't already done so, please sign it and forward details to your friends. If you have a blog, provide a link to the petition

Saturday, 25 April 2009

Swine Flu Outbreak In Mexico Update



Worrying developments, it has already killed as many as 68 people and infected possibly 1,000.

The new strain contains gene sequences from North American and Eurasian swine flus, North American bird flu and North American human flu, said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A similar virus has been found in the American Southwest, where officials have reported eight nonfatal cases.

Most of Mexico’s dead were young, healthy adults, and none were over 60 or under 3 years old, the World Health Organization said. That alarms health officials because seasonal flus cause most of their deaths among infants and bedridden elderly people, but pandemic flus — like the 1918 Spanish flu, and the 1957 and 1968 pandemics — often strike young, healthy people the hardest.

There hasn't yet been a call to reduce travel, which could spread this around the world rapidly. One more effect of so much plane travel, unlike the '18 '57 and '68 more contained pandemics.

UPDATE Government advice says don't sneeze on people, and don't go out! And they are smug that we have enough of the vaccine, though it may not work.

While numbers of the dead in Mexico climb over 100, the first European case was confirmed in Spain. They refuse to consider a more cautionary approach to flying to or from Mexico, saying their models show it wont work and will cost money. Why then have a quarantine system at all? Perhaps they are scared of the Air travel lobby, who do seem to get everything they want.

Recent News here

Friday, 24 April 2009

New Phone Masts A Waste Of Energy

A recent report shows huge energy wastage from mobile phone masts. What the network wastes every year would power several big city tram systems or 68,000 homes, say Greens.

Competition between mobile phone companies is wasting almost 300 GWh a year due to duplication of telephone network equipment, says a new report from the Green Party.
According to the report, to be published Monday 20 April, the amount of energy currently wasted by the mobile phone networks would be enough to:
Run almost a third of the London Underground.
Power seven Docklands Light Railways.
Keep the Blackpool Tramway going for 137 years.
Meet the electricity needs of around 68,000 homes.

The report, Better Together, argues that mobile phone companies must cooperate to cut the industry's emissions as part of Britain's fight against climate change.
Darren Johnson AM, the Green Party’s spokesperson on trade and industry, commented today:“The government should require mobile phone operators to share facilities.
“They would save money, cut CO2 emissions and provide the same level of signal cover with fewer masts.

“In the short-term operators could be required to share base stations at times of low demand. The government should direct Ofcom to ensure that the sharing of the new 800 MHz frequency band is done in a way that is energy efficient.”
“Ultimately they could build new shared infrastructure. They could cooperate on a ‘super-network’.” He concluded: “With the climate crisis deepening, Britain can’t afford this amount of gratuitous waste."

Local Food Advice Website





A recent BBC Food article highlights that 50% of our vegetables come from abroad, and our domestic approach to food miles is responsible for a third of UK households impact on climate change!

Localfoodadvisor is a very informative Local Food website in The UK & Ireland, and they are supporting and promoting local producers and farmers markets, regional food, regional recipes and specialities, as well as local food restaurants. They are also working with The Rare Breeds Survival Trust (RBST), CPRE and the British Food Trust to encourage producers to use high animal welfare and environmental methods and to support British producers.

Localfoodadvisor Ltd

Email: matthew@localfoodadvisor.com

Web: http://www.localfoodadvisor.com

localfoodadvisor.com 400 Thames Valley Park Drive

Thames Valley Park, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 1PT

Web: http://www.localfoodadvisor.com

Emai: info@localfoodadvisor.com

Telephone: (0118) 965 3502

Thursday, 23 April 2009

Biofuel plant proposed in London

The company Blue NG has applied to the London Borough of Ealing Council for planning permission to build a new electricity power station burning biofuels. Blue NG is a subsidiary of the National Grid and start up company 2OC. They have stated that they plan eight biofuel power plants initially, and they have spoken of a possible 43 in the media.

Last year, over 100 organisations worldwide signed an Open Letter opposing those plans. Food Not Fuel (London) are also campaigning against Blue NG's power plant (see: http://sites.google.com/site/foodnotfuelorg/) - if you live in London and would like to find out more about that group, please email food_not_fuel@yahoo.co.uk .

Blue NG's Southall plant alone will burn around 76,000 litres of vegetable oil per day to supply 18 MW of electricity. If the eight plants planned by Blue NG in their ‘pilot programme’ go ahead, they might use up approximately 8% of the rapeseed oil produced in the UK – that is if only rapeseed oil was used. Blue NG has not made any binding commitment to not use palm oil. When Biofuelwatch asked the company last year if they would issue a written guarantee that they would not burn palm oil, Blue NG
refused/failed to provide this.

Please edit the text of the letter on the webpage and also the subject line if at all possible, making sure that you quote the reference number P/2009/0780 in any communication.

Personalising your message will increase its impact. Your email will go to
planning[AT]ealing.gov.uk.

Many thanks!

Best regards,

The Biofuelwatch Team

To find the alert and to object against a planning application for a biuofuel power plant in Southall, Ealing, East London, please go to

http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/blueng_2009apr_live.php

Please note that this alert is for people living in the UK only. If you do not live in the UK, please do not take part in the alert.

Wednesday, 22 April 2009

Potholes Again

Cranbury Road



I noticed recently that some roads seem to keep getting potholes. I've posted before about Cranbury Rd, Cranbury Rd again , Wantage + Richmond Rd, Kent Rd + Kensington Rd

Perhaps the repairs that have been done are only temporary, we need something more long lasting. The longer this is left the more it will cost.

Tuesday, 21 April 2009

Earth Day 2009



Earth Day, celebrated April 22, is a day designed to inspire awareness and appreciation for the Earth's environment. It is held annually during both spring in the northern hemisphere and autumn in the southern hemisphere.

Now in its 39th year, Earth Day 2009 will be marked on April 22 with the launch of the "green generation" campaign. It's an ambitious two-year plan that Earth Day's organizers hope will motivate people across the world to reverse environmental decline through a renewed focus on grassroots actions.

The day itself will be marked by events across the world, from gatherings at the National Mall in Washington D.C. to a two-day festival in Tokyo's Yoyogi Park. But the organizers hope that the festivities of the day itself will go further and help to usher in a revolution in minds and lifestyles. There are also more than 40 events registered to take place in China, Japan, the Philippines, South Korea and India.

* Earth Day 1970; Earth Day marks the beginning of the modern environmental movement. Approximately 20 million people participated, with a goal of a healthy, sustainable environment.

* Earth Day 1990; Mobilizing 200 million people in 141 countries and lifting the status of environmental issues onto the world stage, it gave a huge boost to recycling efforts worldwide and helped pave the way for the 1992 United Nations Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.

* Earth Day 2000 sent the message loud and clear that citizens the world 'round wanted quick and decisive action on clean energy.

* Earth Day 2007 was one of the largest Earth Days to date, with an estimated billion people participating in the activities in thousands of places like Kiev, Ukraine; Caracas, Venezuela; Tuvalu; Manila, Philippines; Togo; Madrid, Spain; London; and New York.

Some say its also Lenins birthday, causing some on the right to regard Earth Day as a communist trick! But some sources have him born on April 10, perhaps we have a conspiracy.

http://www.earthday.net/

Keep The Post Public: rallies all across UK CWU



Keep The Post Public: rallies all across UK!

The confirmed event details of CWU Keep The Post Public rallies are as follows: Yorkshire & the Humberside/Leeds: 2pm-3.30pm Saturday 2 May 2009 @ Leeds Art Gallery;
East/Norwich: 7pm - 8.30pm Thursday 7 May 2009 @ Lansdowne Hotel, Norwich;
North East/Newcastle: 11am-12.30pm Saturday 9 May 2009 @ Assembly Rooms, Newcastle; South West/Bristol: 7.30pm - 9pm Tuesday 12 May 2009 @ TGWU Head Office, Bristol; North West/Manchester; 7pm - 8.30pm Wednesday 13 May 2009 @ Manchester Town Hall, Albert Square, Manchester;
South East/Southampton: 11pm - 12.30pm Saturday 16 May 2009 @ Friends Meeting House, Ordanance Road, Southampton;
East Midlands/Nottingham: 7pm - 8.30pm Friday 22 May 2009 @ Mechanics Institute, Nottingham.

Additional events are being confirmed.
www.cwu.org

Sunday, 19 April 2009

Labour Election Disaster



The Labour Party really are on a downward spiral. A few days after one of their senior people qiut another was forced to resign over the Damian McBride Rumour Mill

Then comes news that at a Hustings to find a General Election candidate, a ballot box was 'tampered with'. The Labour National Party Executive now will investigate how this happened for the Erith and Thamesmead constituency in south east London.

"It was discovered that the seal on a ballot box containing previously received ballot papers for the selection of Labour's parliamentary candidate for Erith and Thamesmead was broken. "In order to maintain the integrity of the process, [Saturday's] hustings meeting has been immediately postponed and a new date will be fixed."

The candidates include Georgia Gould, the 22-year-old daughter of Lord Gould, a key aide to Tony Blair during his time as prime minister. Some people were concerned she may be not the right person to represent one of the most deprived areas in London, and there were questions over whether she had "any connection with local people". Also it had been a "controversial" selection process due to claims of postal voting "irregularities" and because of "allegations of nepotism" regarding Miss Gould.

Expect an open and honest investigation. Not.

Veteran Labour MP Quits The Party after 50 years


Alice Mahon, a Halifax MP for 18 years and a Labour Party member for more than half-a-century, has resigned her membership of the party saying she can no longer stomach how it operates. The Veteran says she was “shocked and absolutely scandalised” by Damian McBride’s attempts to smear politicians in the recent email scandal.

She was MP for Halifax between 1987 and 2005, and accused the party of betraying its principles; and said it was on course for election defeat. Ms Mahon said it was a difficult decision to quit the party, but said: “I can no longer be a member of a party that at the leadership level has betrayed many of the values and principles that inspired me as a teenager to join.”

In her letter to the Halifax Constituency Labour Party she criticises the Prime Minister: “This Labour Government should hang its head in shame for inflicting this on the British public just as we face the most severe recession any of us have experienced in a lifetime.”

She doesn't mention Gordons role in bringing about this recession, for which her former colleagues will presumably be grateful. Or the corrupt behaviour of Labour MPs claiming expenses, Mandelsons performances, Public Private Partnership, selling off the Post Office, wrecking pensions and their inability to reduce climate change emissions. Its surprising that they have any supporters left.

Green Party Pension Pledge



The Green Party has announced its key election pledge for pensioners - a £165 a week non-means-tested citizens' pension for every pensioner in the UK. The pledge will form part of the Green New Deal for Older People,which the Green Party will launch in the build-up to this year's European elections.

Felicity Norman, Green MEP candidate for the West Midlands who is speaking at rally in Birmingham’s Victoria Square said: "The Green Party today calls for possibly the best action a political party could take for British pensioners: a policy that would lift all our pensioners out of poverty."

For 2007/8 this would have meant a single person’s pension of £151 per week - compared to the actual full state pension of £90.70 and a pensions credits guarantee level of about £120 a week.

The The National Pensioners Convention has recently pointed out that:
- Between 1997 and 2006, the number of British people living in severe poverty – defined as living on less than 40% of median population income – increased by 600,000.
- Last year the poorest quarter of UK pensioner households saw their incomes rise by less than 1%, well below inflation. The poorest single pensioners saw their real incomes drop by 4%.
- At least 15% of UK pensioners – over 1.5m older people – are living in persistent poverty (below 60% median population income for three out of the last four years).
- Pensioner poverty in the UK has risen in the last year by 300,000 - equivalent to 822 people a day - and now reaches 2.5m (1 in 4 older people). Two thirds of these pensioners are women. Felicity Norman, Green European Election Candidate said: "If the other parties are unwilling to lift pensioners out of poverty, then it's clear pensioners will need to elect Greens to fight their corner. "Voting Green is about building a better future - and that includes a secure economic future for older people."

Notes:
The National Pensioners Convention (NPC) have been calling for a pension at or above the official poverty level, which is defined as 60% of median population earnings less housing costs.

Wednesday, 15 April 2009

Vote To Keep Kings Meadow Baths


The local council have been trying to destroy the listed Kings Meadow Baths for years, mostly through neglect.

I've written about the baths before as has Rob White. Latest from Rob here.
Click here and scroll down to vote. The local paper, Reading Evening Post, has a poll where you can express your opinion as to the fate of these Baths.

The campaign website is here.
RBC plans here.

More than 100 people opposing the proposals attended a meeting on Wednesday called by Bob O’Neill, who chairs the King’s Meadow Campaign (KMC), to discuss the two options the borough council’s cabinet will be looking at. Central to the two plans is the Grade II-listed Edwardian open-air swimming pool, which would be restored to use under both schemes.

Saturday, 11 April 2009

Geo-engineering And Biochar

The Green Party recently voted to resist proposals for large scale use of charcoal in soils for climate change mitigation, and against their inclusion into carbon markets. Biochar, along with agrofuels, would result in devastating expansion of industrial agriculture which threatens people, climate and ecosystems.

Industrial scale "biochar" is the latest dangerous planetary geo-engineering proposal to 'save the Earth' and humanity from climate change without reducing emisions; its consequences would destroy biodiversity and make us more vulnerable than we are already. Geo-engineering is the technique to tackle climate change by either removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (e.g. using ocean iron fertilisation) or by managing solar radiation (e.g. by using mirrors in space) in order to negate the net warming effect of climate change.

Biochar (charcoal) enthusiasts intend to burn biomass to produce and bury charcoal, in order to manipulate land use and the biosphere on a vast scale. As if the world's land, 25% of which is already becoming seriously degraded, does not have enough pressures from deforestation, industrial agriculture and sprawling human settlements. Charcoal proposals forestall sufficient climate change measures such as ending the use of coal, protecting and restoring old forests, and reforming industrial agriculture. Let leading science and climate negotiators know this is unacceptable.

Take action here.

An international declaration was launched by 147 organisations last week, opposing the growing hype and political support for Biochar. The groups signing the declaration "strongly oppose the inclusion of soils in carbon trade and offset mechanisms, including in the Clean Development Mechanism.” The groups further assert that "the 'biochar' initiative fails to address the root causes of climate change.”

Those issuing this warning range from small farmers associations and forest protection groups to international environmental networks and human rights advocates. Further organizations are being invited to sign the declaration. Ecological Internet has independently organized a protest alert questioning whether enough "waste biomass" and "degraded and marginal" lands exist to carry out geoengineering of the Earth's land and climate at the scale proposed, and without intensifying industrial tree plantations and all their attendant problems.
A new declaration states "Biochar, a New Big Threat to People, Land and Ecosystems" has been launched as UN and government delegates are meeting in Bonn this week to discuss a post-2012 climate change agreement. One of the proposals which they will be discussing is to allow carbon credits for using charcoal as a soil additive in the hope that this will create a permanent 'carbon sink' and help to reduce global warming, and reclaim degraded soil.  They will also discuss whether to generally include agricultural soils into carbon trading.

Civil society groups have called for caution on Biochar in view of serious scientific uncertainty. Many share concerns that this technology would lead to vast areas of land being converted to new plantations, thus repeating the unfolding disasters which agrofuels cause. They point out that large scale financial incentives for biochar or other soil sequestration could result in large scale land conversion and displacement of people.

Helena Paul from EcoNexus states: "Including biochar and agricultural soil in carbon markets would turn soils into a commodity that could be sold to offset pollution elsewhere. It would endanger smallholder farmers and indigenous peoples who cannot compete with governments and large companies and who are at risk of being displaced if the ground is literally sold out from under their feet."

Stella Semino from Grupo de Reflexion Rural, Argentina adds: "The idea that charcoal will rescue a burning planet is absurd. Some biochar proponents call for quantities of charcoal which would require over 500 million hectares of industrial tree and crop plantations. We know already that industrial agriculture and tree plantations are a major contributor to climate change and displace people and biodiversity. We need to protect ecosystems, not grow vast new monocultures and burn them! This is a farce.”

Almuth Ernsting from Biofuelwatch states: "Large-scale support for biochar is premature and dangerous. Claims that biochar is retained permanently in soils and increases fertility are based on Terra Preta soils in Amazonia, which were made by indigenous peoples hundreds or even thousands of years ago. Those farmers used biodiverse organic residues and compost, as well as charcoal. Modern biochar is not the same. Some companies are making biochar out of municipal waste and tyres, others promote using biochar to scrub flue gases from coal burners and then using this combination as a fertilizer. Some plan to use giant microwave ovens to char trees – justifying this by pointing to ancient Amazonian soils is absurd."

Green New Deal On Radio 4

Interesting discussion on the Green New Deal on Beyond Westminster
this morning on radio4 , they talk to some greens in Oxford.
Including Cllr Sushila Dhall, PPC Chris Goodall etc

Its on listen again,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00jq7nd
or go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/programmes/schedules/fm scroll to
11am beyond westminster anc click on listen again.


Looking at politics beyond and outside the Westminster parliament. Elinor Goodman examines a 'Green New Deal' which has been promised to fight global warming and the recession at the same time. She discovers, however, that tensions between short and long term priorities are making green politics a challenge.

Friday, 10 April 2009

Japan: If defending whales is a crime, arrest us all



If Japan is going to start rounding up political prisoners for the crime of defending whales, they're going to have to arrest a whole heaping lot of us.

Junichi Sato is one of Greenpeaces Ocean campaigners in Japan, now facing a maximum of 10 years in prison for exposing the crime of Japan's whaling industry.

After nine months of disconnection from their colleagues and workplace, Junichi Sato and Toru Suzuki walked back into the Greenpeace Japan office last week. He is very thankful to all who took action for him and he has been kind enough to share some thoughts on his return. Please read them in their staff blog.

And if you haven't already taken action against this injustice - tell Japan they should arrest you too - for standing against the killing of whales in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary and opposing the scandal and corruption of their whaling industry.

For the Whales,
Greenpeace

Make Your Own Billboard



On http://jamesholden.net/billboard/ you can alter the text on the billboard.
See if you can come up with a better slogan than mine pictured.

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

Police Hit Man At G20, Shortly Before He Dies

Evidence has emerged that the police hit Ian Tomlinson at the G20, shortly before he died. You can see the video here.

It bears some resemblance to the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, particularly the misinformation in the media distracting from the events. The de Menezes family clearly agree.

I have written to my MP at http://www.theyworkforyou.com/ and urge you to do the same.

Dear MP,

I am sure by now you will have seen the shocking video of a police officer attacking an innocent bystander – Ian Tomlinson – who happened to be walking past one of the many G20 demonstrations.

He suffered a baton attack from behind by a police officer and after striking his head on the floor he later died.

The police are unapologetic about his death, describing their actions as 'maintaining order' on Radio 4 today.

After seeing the video this seems hard to swallow. It makes it clear that he was not presenting a threat to anyone, nor was he in any way causing trouble. If this were a member of the public holding a baton, striking a man to the floor, who later died as a result, that person would promptly be put in jail. However, because the perpetrator is a police officer this apparently does not hold true.

The police officers involved and the way the matter has been handled so far have shown a disregard for the law and for common decency, which erodes the public's confidence in the police as a whole. The police conduct on Wednesday 1st April as a whole was disgraceful, and clearly showed an intention to crack down on legitimate protest and dissent.

Please – I urge you to raise this matter in the House of Commons and put pressure on the police to ensure that justice prevails.
Yours sincerely,
Adrian Windisch

Monday, 6 April 2009

Keira Knightly In new Women’s Aid Campaign to Stop Domestic Abuse

This is shockingly powerful.


Actress Keira Knightley is seen suffering a brutal assault in a new advertisement highlighting the issue of domestic violence. The two minute TV and cinema ad, for the charity Women’s Aid, shows the star being beaten by her partner after she returns home from a film set.

See it on Youtube

Google launches Street View despite privacy concerns




The controversial mapping service launched in the UK last month, allowing people to take a virtual tour through 25 British cities. In the face of fierce opposition from privacy campaigners, Google launched its controversial mapping service Street View, which offers users 360-degree views of selected cities across Britain. The search giant spent more than a year collecting images of Britain’s streets using cars fitted with special cameras. They came to Reading last week, I took the picture above. I'm looking forward to seing on street view the image of me taking this picture.

The service allows people to "walk" along a selected road at street level, from their computer or mobile phone. Hundreds of thousands of people have already used Street View to peek at the front doors of friends and family, and take a virtual tour of the streets of their city.

A village in Buckinghamshire called the police when they saw the Google Street View car A spate of burglaries in a Buckinghamshire village had already put residents on the alert for any suspicious vehicles, so when the Google Street View car trundled towards Broughton with a 360-degree camera on its roof, villagers sprang into action. Forming a human chain to stop it, they harangued the driver about the “invasion of privacy”, adding that the images that Google planned to put online could be used by burglars. Well congratulations people, now burglars around the world are aware that the residents of this village think they are worth the attention of burglars. I think they should be arrested for wasting police time, imagine calling the police every time you saw a strange car, you'd be very busy.

Find the weirdest sights on Google Street View UK

Google has taken longer than expected to launch the service, which is already available in seven other countries. Many people believed that the company was stalling in order to overcome the concerns of campaigners.

However, Google said that the launch was delayed by logistical difficulties. The poor British weather over the past few months wreaked havoc with Google's high-tech equipment, as their cameras are unable to take pictures in rain or snow. As a result, it has taken much longer than expected to compile the tens of millions of photos needed to launch the service.

Street View has already proved controversial. When it launched in the United States, there was uproar, as within hours bloggers posted images of people, their faces visible, being arrested, sunbathing and urinating in public. Taking into account the objections of many campaigners, Google has introduced technology which automatically blurs faces and car number plates. Google has also pledged to remove any images that viewers object to.

"We recognise that people do have some concerns in terms of privacy," said Google’s geospatial technologist Ed Parsons. "But this is the sort of level of detail you would get from driving down a road, the sort of picture you would see in an estate agent’s window." He said faces were blurred “99.9 per cent of the time,” but that “sometimes it does not work completely".

Simon Davies, director of Privacy International, argued that the company should have sought the consent of the communities it was photographing before launching the service. He vowed to fight the service until it was taken down. The Information Commissioner’s office was consulted by Google about its plans, and gave approval for the launch. Lawyers doubt any legal action could succeed. Google said that it will continue to update and expand the service, and will add more photos of more cities over the coming months.

Cities covered by Street View UK so far: London, Edinburgh, Leeds, Bradford, Cambridge, Cardiff, Belfast, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Oxford, Sheffield, Nottingham, Derby, Bristol, Coventry, Glasgow, Aberdeen, Swansea, York, Newcastle, Dundee, Southampton, Norwich and Scunthorpe.

Thursday, 2 April 2009

War on Want No Sweat day of action against Primark 4th April


Guest Post from War on Want

Hi everyone!

1. Day of Action against Primark – Saturday 4 April in London and Brighton

War on Want is supporting a No Sweat day of action against Primark, which continues to make huge profits off the back of exploiting workers in their supply chains.

To highlight this continued abuse and to call for a living wage, fair working hours and conditions and freedom of association, demonstrations featuring a mobile fashion show will take place outside Primark stores in London and Brighton on Saturday. We do not call for a boycott but instead for proper regulation of corporations around the world that will stop sweatshop abuse across the garment industry.

For the exact locations and times, please see: http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://www.waronwant.org%2Fnews%2Fevents

For more information about War on Want’s Supermarkets and Sweatshops campaign, please see: http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://www.waronwant.org%2Fcampaigns%2Fsupermarkets


2. Thanks for your support!

A huge thank you to all the War on Want supporters and activists who took part in the Put People First march on Saturday 28th March and those who were at the Financial Fools demonstration at the Bank of England yesterday.

Footage from the Put People First March here: http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://www.waronwant.org%2Fact-now%2Fprevious-events%2F16498-thousands-demand-an-economic-system-that-puts-people-firs

Footage from the Financial Fools demonstration here: http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://www.waronwant.org%2Fnews%2Fcampaigns-news%2F16509-financial-fools-day-g20-protest-at-the-bank-of-england

To find out about War on Want’s demands around the financial crisis, please see here: http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://www.waronwant.org%2Fcampaigns%2Ffinancial-crisis


Thank you and Solidarity,

Seb
sklier@waronwant.org
War on Want

UPDATE:
Two anti-poverty groups has been refused entry to today's G20 summit after allegedly having its accreditation withdrawn. War on Want and the World Development Movement (WDM) had both been given approval to attend the event in London's Docklands. The WDM said last night that its accreditation had been withdrawn, and War on Want revealed today it had also been prevented from sending a representative.

John Hilary, executive director of War on Want, said he had travelled to the ExCel Centre this morning to attend the summit only to be told that he was no longer accredited. At first the organisers told him a "computer glitch" was responsible, but further inquiries revealed that he had been barred, he said. Hilary said he did not know whether No 10 or the Foreign Office had withdrawn his accreditation.

"It's certainly someone within the government who clearly feels there's a need to keep out groups who will stand up for the people they represent," he said. "It smacks of desperation on the part of the government. What have they got to hide?"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/02/g20-protests-london

Police have been criticised for the force they used to break up protests yesterday, with baton-wielding officers said to be pushing through a line of tents and bicycles and charging a sit-down protest.

One photographer has also contacted the Guardian alleging police prevented him doing his job and attacked him, leaving him with a broken arm. He said he was furious at the treatment by officers who appeared to be lost in a "red mist" of anger. "I covered the poll tax riots,

A man has died at the G20 protest






A man has died at the G20 protest. Emergency services were called by a member of the public who found the man unconscious in the street. Police officers arrived at the scene first, but the man had stopped breathing. A police source said it was likely the man died from a medical condition, although that would not be confirmed until after a post-mortem. They dearly hope this is the case.

From treslola:
For around 3 hours, from 12:30pm, police officers formed human barricades to block the free movement of demonstrators in and around the Bank of England. Police officers disallowed people the right to leave the campaign area, they decided that the best way to communicate this lock down was to yell at and push back any demonstrator that dared come close to their shoulder-to-shoulder blockade. We were detained without reason and with force.

Essentially, anyone inside this penned off area spent three hours without any provision of water, food, toilet facilities and with limited access to shaded areas. For the most part, those in this area were keen to be there and thus being disallowed free movement around London was not of key concern.

What occurred outside of the Bank of England was a largely peaceful demonstration attended by a multitude of social justice groups. The minority that hurled objects through windows and started small blazes in the street were given extensive media coverage and exceptional focus was placed on these people as if they were indicative of what the greater proportion of campaigners were about.

'Demonstration' is not synonymous with 'Violence'.


From Indymedia:
A photographer was taken to one side by police and threatened under anti-terror legislation that he was not allowed to take pictures of police "engaged in their duty." Police confiscated his camera and attempted to delete all the photographs he'd taken. The photographer pulled out another camera to film them doing this, and was threatened again, but police then returned the first camera.

At midnight: 'Police are now moving from south to north pushing people out of the space occupied by the climate camp, and it's clearing out fast.'

Google news Reuters
JimJay Daily Maybe blog
Up to date twitter feed from the G20
Noel Lynch is carrying a report on police tactics today
'When police in riot gear appeared and one protester was arrested, bottles started to fly over our heads, so we edged away from our corner of Princes Street to try and find a safer spot. By now, a lot of people desperately wanted to be let out of the cordon and the atmosphere was becoming increasingly volatile.'

Leninology reports on police behaviour. People were "pounded with clubs and left covered in their own blood." "One lady got dragged roughly across the street"

Student Medic also reports on the violence
'Sadly, the protest was marred by violent and provocative tactics used by the police in their attempts to contain demonstrators. Thousands of demonstrators including pregnant women and young children were ‘kettled’ in to a small area immediately outside the Bank of England with only those who had work ID for the local area or were NUJ members allowed out of the police blockades. Protesters were denied access to food, water and toilets for over 2 hours. A small minority of protesters trying to escape from the enclosure early on were arrested by the police. Furthermore, police on horseback appeared rapidly to prevent protesters advancing down a side street. The use of police on horseback against pedestrian demonstrators is wholly inappropriate and stokes up violence and fear in protesters unnecessarily.

It was only after the police on horseback appearing (very suddenly) and the police running into the crowd and hitting people with battons that some protesters broke windows at the Royal Bank of Scotland'


George Monbiot:
'The trouble-makers are out in force again. Dressed in black, their faces partly obscured, some of them appear to be interested only in violent confrontation. It's almost as if they are deliberately raising the temperature, pushing and pushing until a fight kicks off. But this isn't some disorganised rabble: these people were bussed in and are plainly acting in concert. There's another dead giveaway. They are all wearing the same slogan: Police.

The police have been talking up violence at the G20 protests for weeks. They briefed journalists and companies in the City of London about the evil designs of the climate campaigners intending to demonstrate there.'

A report by the parliamentary committee on human rights last week, about the misuse of police powers against protesters said "Whilst we recognise police officers should not be placed at risk of serious injury, the deployment of riot police can unnecessarily raise the temperature at protests."


Youtube sky news report
interactive protest map
Guardian G20 Blog

Jamie Oliver cooks dinner for the G20

Video of Obama's armoured limousine, known as 'The Beast'
Inside 'The Beast', The £250,000 limo dubbed The Beast that President Obama is cruising in, is equipped with rocket-propelled grenades, a night-vision camera and pump-action shotguns to destroy would-be attackers. The Beast’s titanium superstructure is capable of shielding the president from a chemical weapons attack. Its sealed interior forms an impenetrable “panic room” if the vehicle is attacked. The car contains a teargas cannon, oxygen tanks and bottles of the president’s AB blood type. The limo can drive at speeds of more than 60mph (96kph) with punctured tyres. The five-inch rocket proof glass is so thick that President Obama needs fluorescent light to read in the darkness.'

However, some good has come from all this; 'Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev have begun talks at the US embassy residence in Regent's Park, central London, aimed at achieving significant nuclear disarmament and reshaping relations between their two countries.

Wednesday, 1 April 2009

Pavement Blocking In West Reading




Talk about inconsiderate people blocking pavements with their vehicles!

For parents with buggies, people using wheelchairs or elderly people who need support to walk, having pavements blocked by parked cars can mean there is no way through without being forced to risk walking in the road.

We are making a specially designed flyer available for residents to print out, via our website -- www.readinggreenparty.org.uk. They are also asking the council to display these leaflets in the Civic Centre. Residents will then be able to put the flyer on the windscreens of cars blocking pavements. These flyers explain why blocking pavements has such a harmful impact on local pedestrians, and asks the owners to park in a more considerate way.

Green Party campaigner Rob White said:

"We all see cars and vans blocking pavements every day. Half the time drivers probably don’t think about the problems they’re causing for anyone using buggies or wheelchairs. But in some parts of Reading they’re making life very hard for people simply trying to get about their daily business, and it’s the most vulnerable that get affected the most. Not only that, but pavements aren’t built to withstand the weight of vehicles – by driving onto them footpaths get damaged, creating trip hazards that cause even more problems.

"It’s unacceptable to block pavements with vehicles and force people to walk on the roads, when over 33,000 people on foot get injured by vehicles every single year. We want to get our pavements back and be able to walk around safely - that’s why we’ve started this campaign."