Some of the UK's biggest green groups have slammed the Government's shortlist of tidal power projects being proposed for the Severn Estuary in the southwest as "seriously flawed". A report commissioned by environmental groups including the National Trust, RSPB and WWF, and carried out by Atkins, claims the Government is pushing large-scale schemes that will damage local wildlife at the expense of smaller-scale projects.
The Government's favourite scheme, the Cardiff-Weston barrage, which could meet up to 6% of the UK's electricity demand, would also permanently flood protected areas of the Estuary wetland. The coalition of environmental groups criticise the decision to include the larger barrage schemes while ruling out projects based on lagoon technology, which would be potentially much less damaging.
The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) counters that this technology is much further off commercial viability - but one that is nevertheless being supported by £500 million in research funds. However, the coalition maintains that the Government's report has "several serious shortcomings in the power calculations which bias the shortlisting process". They also claim that the Government is using out of date data. The environmental groups are now calling on the Government to scrap its current list and draw up a new one that gives a fair assessment of more innovative projects.
For further information:
www.rspb.org.uk/Images/Atkins_review_tcm9-216760.pdf http://severntidalpowerconsultation.decc.gov.uk/
Source Energy Efficiency News
Reading University end of term update
-
We got the following update from Reading University. Green councillors will
keep working with the University to improve the town for everyone.
This is ...
5 years ago
5 comments:
Supposing I was thinking of voting Green - I have a question.
If, on environmental grounds you were able to ban either the combustion engine or the aero engine - which would you ban?
This comment isn't relevant to this post. It also assumes that jet engines don't use combustion, when I understand most do.
I would rather answer your question by stating that I would like to reduce the fastest growing source of emissions, the rise in plane travel.
There are many similar posts but this is one of mine;
http://greenreading.blogspot.com/2007/11/ways-to-reduce-your-emissions.html
Surely the aero engine runs on Nestlé chocolate and therefore supports the cocoa-slave industry as well as the worst of the baby milk substitutes industry? Clearly the greater evil!
Get you! 'this comment isn't relevant' - point taken, I won't darken your doorstep again.
It isn't related to this thread Gideon, which is about the tidal barrage.
I still answered it though. Which you seem to have ignored.
Post a Comment