I was reading a few other blogs today, very thought provoking. 'In the Commons, 110 of 645 MPs have a BSc or equivalent, whereas nearly as 400 have humanity or law qualifications.' At least they have some qualifications, some don't.
Julian Huppert, LD PPC for Cambridge, has written about the need for more qualified scientists and engineers in parliament. 'A successful PR agency will be able to create a good response for a product, whatever the true merits of the product. A scientist or engineer, however, succeeds based on things working.'
I’m glad someone thinks we need more engineers in Parliament, I just happen to be an engineer. But I don't think that would address the problem. Most MPs are lawyers or career politicians, and they don't have the required skills of reflect the population. I think most engineers and scientists lack the communication skills needed.
I think we need MPs who have experience as employers, team workers & as volunteers. They should have applied for jobs and hired other people. Too many have very limited backgrounds, and are hopelessly out of their depth. We also need more women, and people from different backgrounds and with a wide variety of skills.
Sanbikinoraion says 'Ideally, legislators should have a sharp eye for detail, excellent reading comprehension skills, an excellent grasp of statistics, an understanding of history and political philosophy and a set of novel personal background experiences to bring to the table.'
In practise, after convincing their party members that they will perform well, PPCs then must convince 35,000+ skeptics to give them a job, 'through awareness-raising campaigning, doorstepping, local problem solving, successful media interviews and appearances, and being able to recall and reframe the main planks of their party's brand identity at will'.
To every rule there are exceptions; I have met some young PPCs who have built up there local parties from a handful to a strong force that others must take seriously. That is such an impressive feat that I think they are capable of being brilliant MPs regardless of their backgrounds or experience.
Elinor Ostrom’s pragmatism:4:30pm, May 29th, 2018 Bush House North East Wing, Kings College, University of London - ‘He was, indeed, in the habit of always comparing what he heard or read with an already familiar canon, and felt his admiration quicken if he could detect ...
1 week ago